Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0813 14
Original file (NR0813 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Be eee eee. ene

BUARG FOR CORRE GTO OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 8. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARUNGTON, VA 22704-2490

 

EGA

Docket No: 0813-14
28 Jamarv 2015

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552,

A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval

Records, sitting in executive session, considered your

application on 28 January 2015, After careful consideration of :
your application, the Board concluded that your application was

not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of

justice to ‘excuse your failure to submit your application in a

timely manner. Specifically, you stated “I believe my career

and job opportunities have been affected due to the type of
discharge” as a reason for waiving the statute of limitations.

The Board determined this reason was insufficient to waive the
Statute of limitations.

You may request reconsideration of this decision within one year
from the date of the Board’s decision. However, your request
must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available to you when you submitted your application,
Further, the evidence must pertain to the timeliness of your
application or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence,
further review of your application is not possible.

Sincerely,

ROBERT J. .O' NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4027 14

    Original file (NR4027 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 4027-14 28 April 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. After careful consideration of your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1162 14

    Original file (NR1162 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you stated “to apply for VA compensation for ankle injury on active duty with subsequent disability I...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3503 14

    Original file (NR3503 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4900 14

    Original file (NR4900 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4995 14

    Original file (NR4995 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR520 14

    Original file (NR520 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4134 14

    Original file (NR4134 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6460 14

    Original file (NR6460 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6359 14

    Original file (NR6359 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12687 14

    Original file (NR12687 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on-6 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.